A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Time Step When Propagating with the Lanczos Algorithm

dc.contributor.authorMohankumar, N.en
dc.contributor.authorCarrington, Tucker Jr.en
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-06T19:44:19Z
dc.date.available2020-01-06T19:44:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractTo use the short iterative Lanczos algorithm to solve the time-dependent Schroedinger equation, one must choose, for a given Lanczos space size, a time-step. We compare the derivation of the well-known Lubich and Hochbruck time step from SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997) 1911 with the a priori time step we proposed in Mohankumar and Carrington (MC) Comput. Phys. Commun., 181 (2010) 1859 and demonstrate that the MC time step is somewhat larger, i.e., that the MC error bound is tighter. In addition, we use the MC approach to derive an error bound and time step for imaginary time propagation. The error bound we derive is much tighter than the error bound of Stewart and Leyk.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/math7111109
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/27533
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectShort Iterative Lanczos Algorithmen
dc.subjectPropagationen
dc.subjectChebyshev Error Boundsen
dc.titleA Comparison of Methods for Determining the Time Step When Propagating with the Lanczos Algorithmen
dc.typejournal articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sil.pdf
Size:
136.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.77 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: