The Great Auk (Pinguinus impennis) had two brood patches, not one: confirmation and implications

dc.contributor.authorBirkhead, Tim
dc.contributor.authorFiebig, Jurgen
dc.contributor.authorMontgomerie, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSchulze-Hagen, Karl
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T15:47:23Z
dc.date.available2021-09-29T15:47:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-21
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Birkhead, T., Fiebig, J., Montgomerie, R. and Schulze-Hagen, K. (2021), The Great Auk (Pinguinus impennis) had two brood patches, not one: confirmation and implications. Ibis. Accepted Author Manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13019, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13019. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.en
dc.description.abstractSince the late 1600s it has been assumed that the Great Auk Pinguinus impennis was similar to the Common Guillemot Uria aalge and Brünnich’s Guillemot U. lomvia in having a single, central brood patch. Through the examination of eight mounted museum specimens, we show that this is incorrect and that like its closest relative the Razorbill Alca torda, the Great Auk had two lateral brood patches. We discuss how such misinformation persisted for so long. We also review the relationship between the number of brood patches and clutch size in the Alcidae. One implication of two brood patches is that the Great Auk would have incubated in a horizontal posture like the Razorbill, rather than in a semi-upright posture like the Uria guillemots. Assuming that the Great Auk incubated like the Razorbill, it would probably have done so horizontally with its single egg pressed against one of the two lateral brood patches, positioned against the inside of one tarsus (and partially on the web of one foot), and with the wing on that side drooped to provide additional protection for the egg. Incubating in this way may have meant that the Great Auk’s pyriform egg would have enabled it to use both level and sloping terrain, as in the Uria guillemots (but unlike the Razorbill). A horizontal incubation also has implications for estimates of their breeding density, which we estimate to have been around four pairs per square meter and, hence numbers on its largest known colony, Funk Island, Newfoundland (maximum 250,000 pairs).en
dc.identifier.citationBirkhead, T., Fiebig, J., Montgomerie, R. and Schulze-Hagen, K. (2021), The Great Auk (Pinguinus impennis) had two brood patches, not one: confirmation and implications. Ibis. Accepted Author Manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13019en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/29447
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.subjectGreat Auken
dc.subjectBrood Patchen
dc.subjectIncubation Egg Shapeen
dc.titleThe Great Auk (Pinguinus impennis) had two brood patches, not one: confirmation and implicationsen
dc.typejournal articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ibi.13019.pdf
Size:
13.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Author Manuscript

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.77 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: